ПОГЛЕД НА САВРЕМЕНУ СУДСКУ ПРАКСУ У ВЕЗИ СЛОБОДНОГ ИСПОЉАВАЊА ВЕРЕ
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.54561/prj0702261wКључне речи:
Free exercise of religion, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, prisoner rights, freedom of speech, church autonomy, reproductive freedomСажетак
Од 1990. године дебата око лимита слободе испољавања религије је дошла до судова, Конгреса и извршне власти. Широк спектар проблема се појавио: употреба имовине, права затвореника, верски говори и удружења у школама, црквена аутономија у запошљавању и Обамина политика о захтевима за здравствено осигурање за верске инситуције и послове. Циљ овог рада је да прикаже садашње стање судске праксе кроз истраживање највећих развоја у овим областима. Чини се да онда када слободно испољавање утиче само на индивидуу или верску институцију, верске слободе имају дозвољен широк опсег. Међутим, када се умешају други политички интереси – као што су хомосексуалне групе или групе за представљање жена – ствари су много компликованије.
Референце
Black Aaron, When Money is Tight, Is Strict Scrutiny Loose? Cost Sensitivity as a Compelling Governmental Interest Under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, Texas Journal of Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Vol. 14, No. 2, Austin, Texas, 2009.
Corbin Caroline, Above the Law? The Constitutionality of the Ministerial Exception from Antidiscrimination Law, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, New York, New York, 2007.
Englander Andrew, God and Land in the Garden State: The Impact of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in New Jersey, Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, Newark, New Jersey, 2009.
Gaubatz Derek, RLUIPA at Four: Evaluating the Success and Constitutionality of RLUIPA’s Prisoner Provisions, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2005.
Goodrich Luke, The Health Care and Conscience Debate, Engage, June 27, 2011, Washington, D.C.
Larson Jennifer, RLUIPA: Distress and Damages, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, Chicago, Illinois, 2007.
Lund Christopher, In Defense of the Ministerial Exception, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2011.
Rassbach Eric, The Affordable Care Act Employer Mandate Case: Regulation versus Conscience on its Way to the Supreme Court, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 2, No. 1, Oxford, UK, 2013.
Salkin Patricia and Lavine Amy, The Genesis of RLUIPA and Federalism: Evaluating the Creation of a Federal Statutory Right and Its Impact on Local Government, The Urban Lawyer, Vol. 40, No. 2, Kansas City, Missouri, 2008.
Stout Taylor, The Costs of Religious Accommodations in Prisons, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 96, No. 3, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2010.
Symposium Issue: Hastings Constitutional law Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2, Spring 2011.
Unsigned Note, Religious Land Use in the Federal Courts Under RLUIPA, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 120, No. 3, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007.
United States Department of Justice, Report on the Tenth Anniversary of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, September 22, 2010.
Waltman Jerold, Congress, the Supreme Court, and Religious Liberty: The Case of City of Boerne v. Flores, Palgrave, New York, 2013.
Waltman Jerold. Religious Free Exercise and Contemporary American Politics: The Saga of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, Continuum, New York, 2011.
