Unraveling the Miracle: The Serbian Orthodox Church and the 2020 Regime Change in Montenegro

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1802429a

Keywords:

Montenegro, Serbian Orthodox Church, regime change, litije

Abstract

This paper investigate the transnational political engagement of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the 2020 regime change in Montenegro. Methods. I used in-depth interviews based on purposive sampling of experts that covers three problems: transnational action; success of litije movement; and political aspirations of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the Balkans. Results. I found that the Serbian Orthodox Church does have the potential to act transnationally; that its decision to act transnationally in Montenegro was key to the success of litije; and that the activities of the Serbian Orthodox Church in the Balkans are guided by Serbian Orthodox nationalism. Conclusions. Contrary to the dominant paradigm, litije showed that the Serbian Orthodox Church is politically ambivalent. Yet, its key challenge remains the lack of church-state separation, as it is only when the Church is independent from the State it can excess its democratizing potential.

References

US Department of State. 2021. “2020 Report on International Religious Freedom: Montenegro.” https://www.state.gov/reports/2020-report-on-international-religious-freedom/montenegro/

Almeida, Paul. 2019. Social Movements: The Structure of Collective Mobilization. Illustrated edition. Oakland: University of California Press.

Baker, Sarah E., and Rosalind Edwards. 2012. How Many Qualitative Interviews Is Enough?. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods.

Berger, Peter L. 1999. The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. 1st edition. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Biber, Sharlene Hesse. 2016. The Practice of Qualitative Research: Engaging Students in the Research Process. 3rd edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Bigović, Radovan. 2022. Crkva i drustvo. Beograd: Hilandarski fond pri Bogoslovskom fakultetu.

Birnir, Jóhanna K., and Henry D. Overos. 2021. Religion and Political Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brubaker, Rogers. 2011. “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches.” Nations and Nationalism 18, no. 1: 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00486.x.

“Crna Gora projektovana da bude ‘mala Ukrajina’, kaže Joanikije.” Radio Slobodna Evropa, March 2022. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/joanikije-ukrajina-crna-gora/31751141.html

Crouch, Mira, and Heather McKenzie. 2006. “The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-Based Qualitative Research.” Social Science Information 45, no. 4 : 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584.

Djordjevic, Dragoljub. 2009. “Religiousness of Serbs at the Beginning of the 21st Century: What Is It About?” In Revitalization of Religion- Theoretical and Comparative Approaches, edited by Dragan Gavrilovic, 57–64. Niš: Yugoslav Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Doroshko, Maria, and Wlodzimierz Baluk. 2021. “The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Context of the Russian-Ukrainian Armed Conflict.” Studia Z Dziejów Rosji I Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej 56: 121–140. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1016745

Džankić, Jelena. 2014. “Reconstructing the Meaning of Being ‘Montenegrin.’” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 14, no. 4: 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2014.967458

Euben, Roxanne. 1995. “When Worldviews Collide: Conflicting Assumptions about Human Behavior Held by Rational Actor Theory and Islamic Fundamentalism.” Political Psychology 16, no. 1: 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791454

Fetzer, Joel S., and Christopher J. Soper. 2004. Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, Jonathan. 2018. An Introduction to Religion and Politics: Theory and Practice. 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Gajić, Nataša. 2020. “Contemporary Serbian Ethno-Religious Nationalism in Montenegro: Position of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the Serbian State towards the Montenegrin Law on Religious Freedom.” MA thesis, Central European University.

Gamson, William A., and Sidney Tarrow. 1999. “Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics.” Contemporary Sociology 28, no. 3: 337-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654187

Gill, Anthony. 2007. The Political Origins of Religious Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gurr, Ted Robert. 1994. “Peoples against States: Ethnopolitical Conflict and the Changing World System: 1994 Presidential Address.” International Studies Quarterly 38, no. 3: 347–377.

Gautier, Mary L. 1998. “Church Elites and the Restoration of Civil Society in the Communist Societies of Central Europe.” Journal of Church and State 40, no. 2: 289–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/40.2.289

Ivanov, Igor. 2017. “Geopolitics of Russian Orthodoxy as an Instrument in the Hybrid War on the Balkans.” Social Change in the Global World 4: 890–901.

Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9, no. 1: 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523

Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Law on Freedom of Religion 2021 (Montenegro). https://www.paragraf.me/nacrti_i_predlozi/predlog-zakona-o-slobodi-vjeroispovijesti-ili-uvjerenja-i-pravnom-polozaju-vjerskih-zajednica.pdf

McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6: 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464

Mylonas, Christos. 2003. Serbian Orthodox Fundamentals: The Quest for an Eternal Identity. Central European University Press.

Nepstad, Sharon Erickson. 2021. “Religious Support for Civil Resistance Movements: When and How Does It Contribute to Regime Change?” Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 7, no. 3: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211054997

Pfaff, Steven, and Anthony Gill. 2006. “Will a Million Muslims March? Muslim Interest Organizations and Political Integration in Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 7: 803–828. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414006287237

Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101, no. 3: 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055407070372

Prodromou, Elizabeth. 2004. “The Ambivalent Orthodox.” Journal of Democracy 15, no. 2: 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0035

Radulovic, Milan. 2012. Crkva i drzava u svetlu Zakona o crkvama i verskim zajednicama. Beograd.

Slater, Dan. 2009. “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 115, no. 1: 203–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/597796

Stepan, Alfred C. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the 'Twin Tolerations'.” Journal of Democracy 11, no. 4: 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0088

Temeljni ugovor između Crne Gore i Srpske pravoslavne crkve. Official Gazette of Montenegro, no. 96/2022.

Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co

Veković, Marko. 2021. Democratization in Christian Orthodox Europe: Comparing Greece, Serbia and Russia. London and New York: Routledge.

Veković, Marko, and Miroljub Jevtić. 2019. “Render unto Caesar: Explaining Political Dimension of the Autocephaly Demands in Ukraine and Montenegro.” Journal of Church and State 61, no. 4: 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csz025

Wald, Kenneth D., Adam L. Silverman, Kevin Fridy, and Clyde Wilcox. 2005. “Making Sense of Religion in Political Life.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Aranđelović, D. (2024). Unraveling the Miracle: The Serbian Orthodox Church and the 2020 Regime Change in Montenegro. Politics and Religion Journal, 18(2), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1802429a